Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Denies Asylum to G
This case marked the first time the Eighth Circuit had considered “whether a parent may bring a derivative claim for withholding of removal based on the fact that her children would be subjected to further persecution.” Following both the Fourth Circuit and the Seventh Circuit, the Court found that fear of future danger to one’s children is not provided for by the statute governing withholding of removal, which requires proof that “the alien’s life or freedom would be threatened.” The Court acknowledged the difficult position in which their decision leaves Gumaneh. She must either leave her children in the
To see the decision, click here.
Compiled from: Gumaneh v. Mukasey, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, 1 August 2008.
In This Section